
A proven methodology for stable, high-performance integration between SAP EWM MFS, WCS, and PLC.
Four critical integration challenges that derail warehouse automation projects
Unclear boundaries between EWM, MFS, WCS and PLC cause unstable and non-contractable responsibilities.
Telegram mismatches, missing monitoring, uncontrolled exception handling, insufficient cutover rehearsal.
Routing decisions and acknowledgement patterns miss required response times, especially for high-speed case conveyors.
Communication points, telegram catalogues and error mappings are not centralized, slowing defect resolution.
Reduced throughput and blocked induction
Unplanned manual workarounds
Elongated hypercare
Elevated vendor claims (ambiguity and non-frozen assumptions)
Proven approach to warehouse automation connectivity
Testable architecture and contract-ready boundaries with defined ownership across SAP, WCS and PLC
End-to-end testing, emulation strategy, disciplined cutover planning with performance and exception handling proven before go-live
Higher throughput stability, faster incident resolution, lower go-live risk
Understanding the automation stack layers
Business process orchestration
Warehouse logic and execution
Direct shopfloor control via telegrams
Machine-centric orchestration where required
Real-time motor and sensor control
Conveyors, cranes, robotics, etc.
Three proven approaches to connect automation
Best for high-speed conveyors and direct control where low latency is critical.
Best for robotics or specialized storage subsystems acting as "black box" controllers.
Best where automation exposes modern APIs or a broker is part of the architecture.
Understanding control depth and decision boundaries
Exception handling, IoT hooks, surrounding process automation
MFS controls routing plus resources like cranes/transfer cars
Direct PLC connection reduces interface complexity
SAP owns logical routing, WCS executes
WCS owns automation (SAP sends high-level tasks)
The PLC always retains real-time control and safety logic. SAP MFS orchestrates tasks and tracking at defined decision points.
Simplifying architecture for better outcomes

SAP EWM β Middleware β PLC (more interfaces, more failure points, higher TCO)
SAP EWM MFS β PLC (simplified architecture, fewer interfaces, improved stability)
Reduced costs and complexity
Improved stability and efficiency
Simpler monitoring and administration
Five phases with quality gates for predictable outcomes
Define project boundaries, stakeholders, and success criteria
Create integration architecture and communication design
Implement MFS configuration and PLC integration
End-to-end testing with emulation and performance validation
Cutover execution and stabilization support
Comprehensive documentation for stable operations
Flexible options tailored to your automation complexity
Early phase architecture & contractable boundaries
Single automation area or MHE line
Full automation zone with multiple interfaces
Large program with multiple vendors/sites/zones
Measurable improvements for your warehouse operations
Fewer interfaces, clean decision-point model
Evidence-based commissioning, emulation, cutover discipline
Performance-oriented routing and handshake design
Monitor-driven diagnostics and standardized triage
Frozen responsibilities, reduced claims and change requests
Extend your automation connectivity capabilities
What belongs in WCS vs MFS
High-speed case conveyor performance tuning
Templates for CP naming, telegrams, error mapping
Cutover rehearsal evidence, command center setup, monitoring readiness
Material Flow System (MFS) is SAP EWM's native automation control layer. It enables direct communication with PLCs via telegrams for real-time warehouse automation control without requiring middleware.
Let's discuss your warehouse automation integration needs
We use cookies and similar technologies to help personalize content, tailor and measure ads, and provide a better experience. By clicking accept, you agree to this, as outlined in our Cookie Policy.